Celtic vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Latvians
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,715,662 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.377% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 377.4 Latvians.
Celtic vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $52,649, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $108,926, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $67,326, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.9% |
Celtic vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.9%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Celtic vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtic vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Celtic vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Celtic vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Fair 6.1% |
Celtic vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Celtic vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.3%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |