Asian vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Asian
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Asians
Latvians
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Asian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,015,198 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Latvians.
Asian vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.0%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $52,649, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $97,311, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($119,955 compared to $120,301, a difference of 0.29%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $63,498, a difference of 0.52%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $53,001, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Asian | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,057 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,955 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $101,681 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,690 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,827 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,586 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,003 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $112,666 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $118,426 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,822 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 27.9% |
Asian vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.5%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Asian | Latvian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.6% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.0% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Asian vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Asian | Latvian |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Asian vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Labor Participation Metric | Asian | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Asian vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Asian | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Asian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Asian | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Asian vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Asian | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.1% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.4% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.4% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Asian vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Asian | Latvian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |