Immigrants from Russia vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,361,950 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 63.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $67,326, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $108,926, a difference of 0.16%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $63,498, a difference of 0.27%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $53,001, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 54.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.3%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and college, under 1 year (69.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%).