Mongolian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,120,976 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.296% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 296.1 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $52,649, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $63,498, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $120,301, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.46%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $67,326, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $43,941, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.5%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and college, under 1 year (69.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.44%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).