Nicaraguan vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,197,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 30.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $52,649, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $120,301, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $63,498, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.93%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $43,941, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 71.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.0%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (67.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.8%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%).