Tsimshian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,438,447 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.989. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.299% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 299.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,344 compared to $52,649, a difference of 30.5%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $63,498, a difference of 30.0%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $53,001, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $43,941, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $108,926, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.21%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 175.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 80.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 52.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 96.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 83.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%).