Ghanaian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,080,832 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $52,649, a difference of 24.9%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($98,877 compared to $120,301, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.36%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $43,941, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $67,326, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 47.0%), and family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.2%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.5%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 68.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%).