Cambodian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,452,225 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to a decrease of 22.0 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $43,941, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $67,326, a difference of 0.65%), median earnings ($53,386 compared to $53,001, a difference of 0.73%), and median household income ($96,324 compared to $97,311, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and bachelor's degree (47.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.2%).