Indian (Asian) vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,405,769 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $52,783, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $108,926, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $97,311, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($53,874 compared to $52,649, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $63,498, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $120,301, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.8%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.1%).