Bahamian vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Latvians

Tragic
Exceptional
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,126,944 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Latvians.
Bahamian Integration in Latvian Communities

Bahamian vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($82,631 compared to $120,301, a difference of 45.6%), per capita income ($36,427 compared to $52,649, a difference of 44.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $108,926, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $52,783, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $43,941, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $67,326, a difference of 32.0%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Income
Income MetricBahamianLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
27.9%

Bahamian vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 69.9%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.8%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Bahamian vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bahamian vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.8%

Bahamian vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.2%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 47.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.5%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Bahamian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
6.1%

Bahamian vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 69.6%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Bahamian vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Bahamian vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricBahamianLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%