Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,111,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Latvians.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $52,649, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.3%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $63,498, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.91%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $43,941, a difference of 22.0%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 89.1%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 82.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.9%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 37.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.5%), family households (67.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 99.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 89.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%