Menominee vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBelarusBelgiumBelizeBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemen
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Menominee

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Menominee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,714,264 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.869. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Latvians.
Menominee Integration in Latvian Communities

Menominee vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,578 compared to $52,649, a difference of 52.3%), median family income ($79,563 compared to $120,301, a difference of 51.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $115,957, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $52,783, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $43,941, a difference of 29.6%).
Menominee vs Latvian Income
Income MetricMenomineeLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,578
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,563
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,423
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$37,884
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,581
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,894
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,907
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,358
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,903
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,719
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Menominee vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 88.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 85.0%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Menominee vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricMenomineeLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
17.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.1%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Menominee vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 127.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 82.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Menominee vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMenomineeLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%

Menominee vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Menominee vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMenomineeLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.7%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.8%

Menominee vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 110.2%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 84.4%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Menominee vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMenomineeLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.30
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.1%
Exceptional
27.7%

Menominee vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%).
Menominee vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMenomineeLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
6.1%

Menominee vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 101.4%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 94.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Menominee vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricMenomineeLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.0%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Menominee vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 56.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), female disability (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Menominee vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricMenomineeLatvian
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%