Soviet Union vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Latvians

Good
Exceptional
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,499,671 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.434% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 434.2 Latvians.
Soviet Union Integration in Latvian Communities

Soviet Union vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 15.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $67,326, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $43,941, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $63,498, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,457 compared to $108,926, a difference of 0.43%), and median family income ($119,262 compared to $120,301, a difference of 0.87%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Tragic
27.9%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.70%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.7%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (24.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.30%), family households (60.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Exceptional
27.7%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 78.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 36.0%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Fair
6.1%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.1%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and bachelor's degree (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Soviet Union vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Soviet Union vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionLatvian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%