Uruguayan vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Uruguayans
Latvians
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Uruguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,065,282 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 66.0 Latvians.
Uruguayan vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.5%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.8%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $63,498, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.61%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $43,941, a difference of 12.0%).
Income Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,318 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,656 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,691 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,190 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,680 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,228 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,465 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,631 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,660 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,090 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.2% | Tragic 27.9% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 38.1%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.9%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Labor Participation Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.7% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 6.1% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.4% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Uruguayan vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Uruguayan | Latvian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |