Pakistani vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Latvians

Good
Exceptional
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,473,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 65.4 Latvians.
Pakistani Integration in Latvian Communities

Pakistani vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,587 compared to $52,649, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($107,390 compared to $120,301, a difference of 12.0%), and median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $63,498, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $52,783, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $67,326, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Income
Income MetricPakistaniLatvian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Tragic
27.9%

Pakistani vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.3%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniLatvian
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Pakistani vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.7%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniLatvian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Pakistani vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Pakistani vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniLatvian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
27.7%

Pakistani vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
6.1%

Pakistani vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Pakistani vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Pakistani vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniLatvian
Disability
Average
11.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%