Immigrants from Egypt vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,219,295 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,361 compared to $52,649, a difference of 11.2%), median family income ($111,689 compared to $120,301, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $43,941, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($93,700 compared to $97,311, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.6%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.96%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (47.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%).