Egyptian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,444,130 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $52,649, a difference of 8.9%), median family income ($114,119 compared to $120,301, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,305 compared to $43,941, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($95,673 compared to $97,311, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($51,701 compared to $53,001, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.3%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.24%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.6%).