Immigrants from Africa vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,298,184 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,950 compared to $52,649, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $108,926, a difference of 20.5%), and wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $43,941, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $67,326, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.1%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.27%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.8%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%).