Maltese vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,750,767 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 133.1 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,640 compared to $52,649, a difference of 6.1%), median family income ($115,862 compared to $120,301, a difference of 3.8%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($97,015 compared to $97,311, a difference of 0.31%), median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $63,498, a difference of 0.86%), and median earnings ($52,526 compared to $53,001, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family households (64.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.30%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.7%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).