Norwegian vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Norwegian
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Norwegians
Latvians
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Norwegian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,830,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Latvians.
Norwegian vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $52,649, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $63,498, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $120,301, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.65%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $67,326, a difference of 10.2%).
Income Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,480 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,144 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,084 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,865 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,965 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,802 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,127 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,866 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,682 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,104 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and female poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Poverty Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and female unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.4% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.08 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.78%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.08 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.4% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.7% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 62.8% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 41.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Norwegian vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.53%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.90%).
Disability Metric | Norwegian | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |