Arab vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,457,475 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,662 compared to $52,649, a difference of 15.3%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $120,301, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $108,926, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $43,941, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.0%), family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.82%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).