Immigrants from Guatemala vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,369,323 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $52,649, a difference of 40.2%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $120,301, a difference of 38.0%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $63,498, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $52,783, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $43,941, a difference of 24.0%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.4%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.8%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 131.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 85.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 81.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).