Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,500,384 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 99.3 Latvians.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $108,926, a difference of 50.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $115,957, a difference of 48.9%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $52,649, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $52,783, a difference of 22.0%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $43,941, a difference of 28.1%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 28.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 68.1%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.0%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.6%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (59.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%