Jordanian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,200,471 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 11.0 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,605 compared to $52,649, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $108,926, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $120,301, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $52,783, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $67,326, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.88%), single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.7%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.83%).