Russian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,588,487 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 39.2 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $44,318, a difference of 19.9%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $100,656, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $53,680, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $52,465, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $39,228, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).