Immigrants from Belgium vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,411,813 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.986. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.160% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 1,160.4 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $44,318, a difference of 24.3%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $53,680, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $100,656, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $52,465, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $39,228, a difference of 13.7%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.44%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.4%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).