Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Uruguayans
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,193,514 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Uruguayans.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $53,680, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $98,660, a difference of 25.9%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $84,691, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $52,465, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $39,228, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Excellent 25.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.9%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Average 11.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Excellent 83.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.16%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.6%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Uruguayan |
Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |