Native/Alaskan vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,062,185 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $44,318, a difference of 33.2%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $84,691, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $100,656, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,465, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $59,090, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 64.3%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 53.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.0%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.6%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.7%).