Samoan vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,775,016 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 11.7 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $44,318, a difference of 11.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $59,090, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $39,228, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($100,344 compared to $100,656, a difference of 0.31%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,385 compared to $93,631, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $84,691, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father poverty (13.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.54%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 63.8%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (11.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%).