Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,297,638 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $59,090, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($91,541 compared to $84,691, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $98,660, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($43,539 compared to $44,318, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $53,680, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.8%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (47.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.45%), college, under 1 year (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.29%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%).