Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Uruguayan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Uruguayans

Fair
Average
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Uruguayan Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,269,114 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.929. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Uruguayans.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Uruguayan Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $44,318, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $84,691, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $98,660, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,465, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,228, a difference of 3.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Good
$44,318
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Fair
$100,656
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Average
$84,691
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Average
$46,190
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Fair
$53,680
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Fair
$39,228
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Good
$52,465
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Fair
$93,631
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Fair
$98,660
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Poor
$59,090
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Excellent
25.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 43.3%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (14.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 6.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Average
12.4%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
16.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 92.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Excellent
83.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Poor
45.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Poor
33.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.5%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.7%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Fair
58.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Average
46.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Good
38.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 91.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Uruguayan Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanUruguayan
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%