Hmong vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,355,106 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.203% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 203.4 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $44,318, a difference of 16.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $98,660, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $84,691, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $59,090, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,465, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($42,111 compared to $46,190, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 73.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 19.4%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.95%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.6%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.3%).