Asian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,509,323 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $93,631, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $84,691, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $98,660, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,465, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($50,057 compared to $44,318, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 23.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.3%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.5%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.55%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%).