Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Uruguayan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Uruguayans

Fair
Average
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Uruguayan Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,511,753 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Uruguayans.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Uruguayan Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $93,631, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($66,768 compared to $84,691, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $98,660, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $39,228, a difference of 14.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $59,090, a difference of 15.0%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Good
$44,318
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Fair
$100,656
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Average
$84,691
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Average
$46,190
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Fair
$53,680
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Fair
$39,228
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Good
$52,465
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Fair
$93,631
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Fair
$98,660
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Poor
$59,090
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
25.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Average
12.4%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Average
16.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Poor
45.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Poor
33.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Fair
58.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Average
46.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Good
38.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Uruguayan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoUruguayan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%