Laotian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,265,751 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $98,660, a difference of 12.6%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $59,090, a difference of 12.2%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $84,691, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $52,465, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $44,318, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.76%), family households (65.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.1%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.61%).