Immigrants from Fiji vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,698,791 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 23.1 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $93,631, a difference of 11.0%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $84,691, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $53,680, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $44,318, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $46,190, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.49%), poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 71.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.32%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%).