Ghanaian vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,368,638 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 19.1 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $44,318, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $93,631, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $52,465, a difference of 0.25%), median earnings ($46,440 compared to $46,190, a difference of 0.54%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $84,691, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.4%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and currently married (42.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 6.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.12%), 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 10th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).