Immigrants from Latvia vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,502,156 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.628% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 2,628.5 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $44,318, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $53,680, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $100,656, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,465, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $59,090, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.78%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%).