Houma vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,844,945 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 201.7 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $102,629, a difference of 42.4%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $86,398, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,390, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $50,563, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,470, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 80.5%), single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 70.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 47.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.1%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.6%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 105.2%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 98.7%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.4%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.6%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 21.7%).