Native Hawaiian vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,835,909 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,709, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $45,049, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $50,563, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($104,910 compared to $105,144, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $96,377, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $102,629, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.34%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.4%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.13, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.97%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.43%).