Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,198,833 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $39,613, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,563, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $61,709, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $102,629, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $105,144, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.2%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%).