Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,329,270 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.867. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.148% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,148.2 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,049, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $96,377, a difference of 10.9%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $105,144, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.61%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,563, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $61,709, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 14.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.5%).