Pima vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,771,091 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,049, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $102,629, a difference of 39.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $86,398, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,613, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $96,377, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 156.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 126.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.6%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 85.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 62.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 5.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 67.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 68.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).