New Zealander vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Slavs

Excellent
Good
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,488,232 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.518% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 518.5 Slavs.
New Zealander Integration in Slavic Communities

New Zealander vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $45,049, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $86,398, a difference of 10.1%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $105,144, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,563, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,613, a difference of 7.1%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.4%

New Zealander vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.2%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.6%

New Zealander vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%

New Zealander vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Good
82.9%

New Zealander vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Average
31.6%

New Zealander vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.6%

New Zealander vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
1.9%

New Zealander vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
New Zealander vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderSlavic
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%