Asian vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Asians

Slavs

Excellent
Good
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Asian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,707,977 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Slavs.
Asian Integration in Slavic Communities

Asian vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $86,398, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $96,377, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $102,629, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $45,049, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $61,709, a difference of 11.5%).
Asian vs Slavic Income
Income MetricAsianSlavic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,057
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,955
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$101,681
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,690
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,827
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,586
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,003
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$112,666
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,426
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,822
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Asian vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Asian vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricAsianSlavic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.0%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.6%

Asian vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Asian vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAsianSlavic
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Asian vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Asian vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAsianSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
82.9%

Asian vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Asian vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAsianSlavic
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.8%
Average
31.6%

Asian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Asian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAsianSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Asian vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
Asian vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricAsianSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.4%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.1%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.4%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
1.9%

Asian vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Asian vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricAsianSlavic
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%