Immigrants from Laos vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,328,832 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $45,049, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $56,390, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $39,613, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $61,709, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%).