Chickasaw vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Slavs
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,057,453 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Slavs.
Chickasaw vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,629, a difference of 24.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,377, a difference of 23.7%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,049, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,563, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,709, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.88%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 82.9% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |