Hawaiian vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hawaiians

Slavs

Fair
Good
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,972,734 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Slavs.
Hawaiian Integration in Slavic Communities

Hawaiian vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $45,049, a difference of 14.3%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $56,390, a difference of 11.7%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,729 compared to $86,398, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $102,629, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $50,563, a difference of 5.0%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Income
Income MetricHawaiianSlavic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,403
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,869
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Average
$84,729
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,673
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,488
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,497
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,078
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$90,722
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,778
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,920
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.19%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricHawaiianSlavic
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Fair
13.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.6%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.6%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHawaiianSlavic
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Excellent
5.2%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHawaiianSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Good
82.9%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.13, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHawaiianSlavic
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.2%
Average
31.6%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHawaiianSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.4%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricHawaiianSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.9%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Hawaiian vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.64%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Hawaiian vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricHawaiianSlavic
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%