Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Slavs
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,789,943 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 33.2 Slavs.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,563, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,709, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,470, a difference of 0.31%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $45,049, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $102,629, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.71%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Average 31.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Slavic |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Fair 2.5% |