Latvian vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,561,915 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 53.4 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,049, a difference of 16.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $105,144, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $96,377, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,563, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,709, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.9%).